RNGR.net is sponsored by the USDA Forest Service and Southern Regional Extension Forestry and is a collaborative effort between these two agencies.

U.S. Department of Agriculture USDA Forest Service Southern Regional Extension Forestry Southern Regional Extension Forestry

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Home Publications Climate Change / Assisted Migration Methods and uncertainties in bioclimatic envelope modelling under climate change

Methods and uncertainties in bioclimatic envelope modelling under climate change

Heikkinen, R. K., Luoto, M., Araújo, M. B., Virkkala, R., Thuiller, W., Sykes, M. T. 2006. Progress in Physical Geography, Volume 20, Number 6: 751-777
Journal Article
Development

Global

Potential impacts of projected climate change on biodiversity are often assessed using single-species bioclimatic ‘envelope’ models. Such models are a special case of species distribution models in which the current geographical distribution of species is related to climatic variables so to enable projections of distributions under future climate change scenarios. This work reviews a number of critical methodological issues that may lead to uncertainty in predictions from bioclimatic modelling. Particular attention is paid to recent developments of bioclimatic modelling that address some of these issues as well as to the topics where more progress needs to be made. Developing and applying bioclimatic models in an informative way requires good understanding of a wide range of methodologies, including the choice of modelling technique, model validation, collinearity, autocorrelation, biased sampling of explanatory variables, scaling and impacts of nonclimatic factors. A key challenge for future research is integrating factors such as land cover, direct CO2effects, biotic interactions and dispersal mechanisms into species-climate models. We conclude that, although bioclimatic envelope models have a number of important advantages, they need to be applied only when users of models have a thorough understanding of their limitations and uncertainties.